Sunday, 28 February 2016

Future possible advances in technology that affect forensic science


As time is of the essence in many police investigations, the future of forensics will implement various Next Generation Sequencing techniques (Bhagat and Shetty, 2014) which require less time to run, such as SOLiD and Illumina (Solexa) sequencing (Mardis, 2008).































Figure 1. A diagram demonstrating the SOLiD method sequences via ligation where a large group of oligonucleotides are labelled by their position on the sequence annealed and ligated, then amplified through PCR (Mardis, 2008).


























Figure 2. Illumina Sequencing enables rapid sequencing of DNA base pairs encompassing entire genomes via bridge amplification resulting in the entire sequence of each chromosome in the DNA sample being recorded (Mardis, 2008).

The application of nanopore technology such as with the USB-key based MinION MkI provides real-time biological analysis due to its accessibility as it can be plugged into a laptop by USB thereby meaning lab-based DNA sequencing is a thing of the past (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, 2016).


























Figure 3. The nanopore is immersed in a fluid and an electrical current is passed through it, and each DNA base moved through the nanopore causes a specific disruption in this electrical current (Eser, 2015).
.

Bhagat, V. & Shetty, C.K. (2014). Amazing Advances in Forensic DNA Analysis – past, present and the future. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(6), pp. 1418–1422.

Eser, R. (2015). The next generation of Sequencing technologies. Retrieved 28 February 2016, from 

Mardis, E.R. (2008). Next-generation DNA Sequencing methods. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 9(1), pp. 387–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359


Oxford Nanopore Technologies. (2016). MinION MkI - products & services - Oxford Nanopore technologies. Retrieved 28 February 2016, from https://www.nanoporetech.com/products-services/minion-mki
Methods
The very first method of DNA fingerprinting and profiling developed by Jeffreys involved collecting DNA by extracting and purifying it from a sample which was then used in tandem with a method known as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Zagorski, 2006).
http://s.hswstatic.com/gif/dna-profiling.jpg
















Current techniques are based on PCR due to its higher sensitivity, speed and precision. The technique uses a panel of different but carefully selected number of short tandem repeats (STR) as markers due to their short repeating patterns and also their similarity in terms of structure to the minisatellites found in the sub-telomeric region of chromosomes (Roewer, 2013). In comparison to the original RFLP analysis, current STR analysis methods do not involve the use of restriction enzymes to cut the DNA at required sites due to the already small length of the DNA markers (Murnaghan, 2014).

STR markers are extracted from the non-coding regions of DNA samples and amplified using PCR, after which a traditional gel electrophoresis is carried out in order to determine the length of the repeats within the DNA. This is an effective method of identification due to the high variability in STR presence, sequence and length amongst individuals, which can then be used to find a match in a database of stored fingerprint information (Butler, 2007).


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQfF8NEjpoOtXcJGB7BDqbIrQuIy-KiB7d9XdPhSi_Ybf4KvtQJ







Forensic applications of DNA technology

Introduction
The first DNA fingerprinting and profiling method was developed by Alec Jeffreys in 1984 at the University of Leicester after realised he could identify individuals based on the small genetic variations in their DNA sequences, even family members as a result of him observing this for his technician’s family. He describes the discovery as his ‘eureka’ moment. Demand for a technique as useful as this was huge and it was quickly used by law enforcement and immigration agencies to solve a multitude of cases (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2014).

Friday, 26 February 2016

References for future advances in Forensic Technology



http://pifeed.com/post/first-dna-phenotyped-image-of-person-of-interest-in-double-homicide/

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1586/14737159.4.1.31

https://connect.innovateuk.org/documents/3144739/3824746/forensic-science-review-report.pdf/f782aabc-e559-454b-8425-fda1bdf47f0c

https://snapshot.parabon-nanolabs.com/

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1674/20140252.full

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187249731530106X

Friday, 5 February 2016

References for section 2

Allocca, S. (2015). First DNA-Phenotyped image of ‘person of interest’ in double homicide. Retrieved 21 January, 2016, from http://pifeed.com/post/first-dna-phenotyped-image-of-person-of-interest-in-double-homicide/

Lamparello, A., & MacLean, C. (2015). Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Criminal Investigations and Criminal Courts: Assessing and Mitigating the Dilemmas Inherent in the Science. Recent Advances in DNA and Gene Sequences, 8(2), pp. 104–112. doi: 10.2174/2352092209666150212001256.  

Norazmi, M.N., & Panneerchelvam, S. (2003). Forensic DNA profiling and database. [Electronic version]. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(2), pp. 20–26.

Norrgard, K. (2008). Forensics, DNA fingerprinting, and CODIS. [Electronic version]. Nature Education, 1(1), p. 35.

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Monday, 25 January 2016

Changes to structure

Legislation section is switched around with future advances section to link the poster better

Friday, 22 January 2016

Final 

2. DNA technology applications in the different forensic fields concerning science.

Two of the main fields include DNA profiling and DNA phenotyping. DNA profiling is the most used, and has been around the longest. It analyses and compares the genomes of DNA samples from a crime scene (saliva, blood or semen) and DNA of potential suspects. Matches between the two can be a huge factor in indicting or exonerating suspects because of high levels of accuracy due to the unique nature of genomes (cite http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561883/). DNA profiling compares short tandem repeats (STRs) within DNA as they vary between individuals and are easy to measure. STRs contains repeating units of DNA sequence, the number of the repeats are known as alleles and they are polymorphic, meaning that they differ from person to person (cite http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/forensics-dna-fingerprinting-and-codis-736).

DNA phenotyping is in its early stages compared to DNA profiling and is affected by ethical and legal issues (cite http://pifeed.com/post/first-dna-phenotyped-image-of-person-of-interest-in-double-homicide/). DNA phenotyping is used when DNA profiling cannot be conducted because no comparative sample is available. It predicts visual characteristics (phenotypes) including hair colour, eye colour and ethnicity of suspects through analysis of various DNA markers affected by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), (cite http://www.eurekaselect.com/128392/article) in order to be used to narrow down a wide range of suspects. Development in DNA sequencing technology has made it possible to efficiently read genetic material from DNA. 

Thursday, 21 January 2016

Draft section 2

2. DNA technology applications in the different forensic fields concerning science. (small section) 
Physiological sciences
*DNA profiling
*DNA phenotyping
*Forensic dentistry
Three of the main fields include DNA profiling, DNA phenotyping and forensic dentistry. DNA profiling is the most used, and has been around the longest. It analyses and compares the genomes of DNA samples from a crime scene (saliva, blood or semen) and DNA of potential suspects. Matches between the two can be a huge factor in indicting or exonerating suspects because of high levels of accuracy because of the unique nature of genomes (cite http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561883/). DNA profiling compares short tandem repeats (STRs) within DNA as they vary between individuals and are easy to measure.
DNA phenotyping is in its early stages compared to DNA profiling and is affected by ethical and legal issues (cite http://pifeed.com/post/first-dna-phenotyped-image-of-person-of-interest-in-double-homicide/). DNA phenotyping is used when DNA profiling cannot be conducted because no comparative sample is available. It predicts visual characteristics (phenotypes) including hair colour, eye colour and ethnicity of suspects through analysis of various DNA markers affected by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), (cite http://www.eurekaselect.com/128392/article) in order to be used to narrow down a wide range of suspects. Development in DNA sequencing technology has made it possible to efficiently read genetic material from DNA.

Finally forensic dentistry uses techniques used in both DNA profiling and DNA phenotyping but focuses mainly on sex determination through extracted DNA from the pulp of the teeth by the use of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) (cite http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541412/). It does this for the identification of human remains.


Sources for section 2

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561883/

Friday, 15 January 2016

Sources for section 3
Discuss a past, a present and a future technique, their advantages and disadvantages.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831584/

https://www.promega.com/~/media/files/resources/conference%20proceedings/ishi%2010/oral%20presentations/01crow.pdf?la=en

http://aboutforensics.co.uk/dna-analysis/

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=13&ved=0ahUKEwj20Z-Ek6zKAhXHzxQKHVuUCmEQFghZMAw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fscience.howstuffworks.com%2Flife%2Fgenetic%2Fdna-evidence2.htm&usg=AFQjCNHs9e67TIb9vcYA1n9BDYCCmBijzA&sig2=bU3R3W27UOqqn7U80B8F4g

Tasks

1. Introduction50-100    *TOGETHER
2. DNA technology applications in the different forensic fields concerning science. (small section) 200  *WASIF
3. Methods, their advantages and limitations. 200  *WAQAS
4. Legislation concerning forensic data handling.  100-200 *JAMES
5. Future possible advances in technology that affect forensic science. 100-150 *CASON
6. Conclusion.50-150     *TOGETHER


7. References.